手机网
关键词
首页>>正文

ZEST试验:在糖尿病患者中比较佐他莫司药物洗脱支架与西罗莫司药物洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架:随机试验亚组分析
[2011/3/30 16:29:46]
 全文(共1页)

    Duk-Woo Park; Haegeun Song; Jong Seon Park; Jong-Young Lee; Won-Jang Kim; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Cheol Whan Lee; Jae-Joong Kim; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park, ZEST Trial Investigators
Asan Med Cntr, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    BACKGROUND Studies comparing the first-generation sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents and the next-generation drug-eluting stents in the high-risk subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus have been limited.
    METHODS The "all-comers" design, ZEST trial was designed to compare the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent with the first-generation sirolimus-and paclitaxel-eluting stent for coronary revascularization in everyday clinical practice, and 2645 patients were enrolled. Randomization was stratified by the status of diabetes. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction [MI], and ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization [TVR]) at 12 months.
    RESULTS A total of 760 diabetic patients (1080 lesions) received a zotarolimus (268 patients, 365 lesions), sirolimus (247 patients, 360 lesions), or paclitaxel (245 patients, 355 lesions)-eluting stent. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the three groups. At 12 months, the zotarolimus-stent group showed similar rates of major adverse cardiac events compared with the paclitaxel-stent group (12.3% vs. 14.3%, P=0.51), but higher rates of events compared with the sirolimus-stent group (12.3% vs. 6.9%, P=0.04). The incidence of death or MI was similar among the groups (zotarolimus- vs. sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-stent, 7.5% vs. 6.2% vs. 8.2%, respectively, P=0.77), but the rate of TVR significantly differ (zotarolimus- vs. sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-stent, 6.3% vs. 0.8% vs. 7.3%, respectively, P=0.001). A nonsignificant trend was detected in favor of the sirolimus-stent group in the rate of stent thrombosis (zotarolimus- vs. sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-stent, 1.5% vs. 0% vs. 1.2%, respectively, P=0.19).
    CONCLUSIONS In patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, the use of zotarolimus-eluting stents results in similar rates of major adverse cardiac events compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, and in higher rates of major adverse cardiac events compared with sirolimus-eluting stents during 1 year of follow-up.
 





更多热点
更多   心血管   相关搜索
声明:登陆《国际循环》手机网不收业务信息费,只产生运营商收取的上网流量费。
返回顶端| About Us | 客服中心 |收藏本站
WapURL手机网址(wap.icirculation.com)